Over-the-road and regional Class 8
100,000 pounds, 308 miles, 21% less fuel
The EOS map was validated on a 6-axle sleeper tractor pulling a tri-axle trailer at maximum gross combination weight, run over an interrupted route and an uninterrupted route against control data from the same configuration.
| Route leg | Miles | Gallons, baseline | Gallons, EOS | Gallons saved | Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Route 9 northbound | 79.3 | 16.4 | 14.3 | 2.1 | 13% |
| Route 9 southbound | 79.4 | 17.8 | 13.7 | 4.1 | 23% |
| Route I-95 northbound | 71.8 | 14.6 | 12.2 | 2.4 | 16% |
| Route I-95 southbound | 77.6 | 15.9 | 11.2 | 4.7 | 30% |
| Both routes, completed | 308.1 | 64.7 | 51.4 | 13.3 | 21% |
What the test does and does not prove
It proves the map produced a consistent reduction on every leg, loaded and empty, on both an interrupted and an uninterrupted route, on a Class 8 configuration at maximum legal weight. That is a real result on a real vehicle configuration, not a brochure claim.
It does not prove your fleet will see 21%. Your drivers, lanes, weights, idle time, and maintenance condition all move the number. That is why we project 2.4% to 3.4% monthly for real-world fleet duty cycles and confirm it against your own baseline before you roll out past the pilot.
Powertrain tested: 6x4 3S box-trailer tractor with sleeper cab, 100,000 lb GCW, Cummins ISX 485 hp and ISX 500 hp, 3.60 axle ratio, Eaton Fuller FRO-16210B 10-speed, progressive shift, standard accessory load.
Run your own numbers
Over-the-road savings calculator
Enter your fleet's real figures. The range applied is the conservative 2.4% to 3.4% monthly band, well below the road-test result.
Start here
Free fleet assessment
Send us your engine specs, route profiles, and last quarter's fuel numbers. We build the baseline model, tell you what the map should do on your duty cycle, and prove it on a pilot against your own data before you commit to anything.
(317) 970-3904
EOS Fuel Management Systems
12175 Visionary Way, Fishers, Indiana 46038